Working Families Party concedes and downsizes without admitting wrongdoing or defeat
A lengthy lawsuit with local political implications came to an end today, with the Working Families Party paying $100,000 to the plaintiffs' law firm and disbanding its for-profit campaign arm. The WFP's executive director issued a defiantly unapologetic statement.
The payment suggests the WFP is acknowledging some wrongdoing in the way it set up a for-profit entity to help the campaigns of candidates supported by the WFP. Opponents of those candidates contended that the campaign arm, Data and Field Services, was providing services at below-market rates, constituting unaccounted-for in-kind contributions.
It's too soon to tell how this development affects the formidable role the WFP has played in recent city and state elections. In theory, the disbanding of the campaign arm can be compensated for--there are always new ways to push the boundaries of campaign-finance law. The more important question may turn out to be whether the settlement is interpreted as an admission of wrongdoing (defiant statement notwithstanding), in which case the Times editorial board, whose endorsements are sometimes crucially important in local Democratic primaries, may look unkindly on the next candidate who accepts the party's help.
A Harvard Law student asks, "How can we be sure that public officials are not using prosaic park-closing regulations as a subterfuge to limit protest?" [Mark Wilson]
"Republicans are reconciling themselves" to the likelihood that George Margos will be Kirsten Gillibrand's challenger. [David Freedlander]
"NYC mayor: Carriage horses lucky to have job" [A.P.]
"[T]he mayor also said there are no plans to try to recoup money from the protesters to pay for expenses that the city has incurred because of the demonstration." [Howard Michael Saul]
A mayoral spokesman notes positive press from an outlet that has not always been positive. [Stu Loeser]
The number of tech jobs in the city jumped 30 percent last year, according to the mayor. [Jenna Wortham]
Councilman Dan Garodnick wants to find out why concerts sell out so fast but nobody gets the tickets. [Jen Carlson]
Queens lawmakers give a thumb-up to local sanitation efforts. [Facebook]
A judge wrote, "We hold that an agency responding to a demand under the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) may not withhold a record solely because some of the information in that record may be exempt from disclosure." [Tully Rinckey]
"Cuomo remains one of the nation's most popular governors." [Jacob Gershman]
A poll from Kiley and Company shows 58 percent of New Yorkers "oppose expanding casino gaming beyond the racetracks." [Joseph Spector]
Cuomo said his prospective veto of legislative lines drawn by legislators, which he has promised to deliver, "isn't a slam dunk" in the courts. [Nick Reisman]
But Cuomo's basic message was that he would veto the lines if they were drawn by legislators. [Joseph Spector]
Unnamed Democrats fear Cuomo will let Republicans draw the lines they want. [David King]
A reporter is "so confused" by Cuomo's comments about redistricting. [@dannyhakim]
The real issue: "the question really is will Cuomo go toe-to-toe over lines drawn by the Senate majority?" [Colby Hamilton]
The details matter: Cuomo said he's still negotiating whether to allow the size of the districts to vary. [Jimmy Vielkind]
Occupy Wall Street is secretly organized by former ACORN organizers, according to FOXNews.com's sources. [FOXNews.com]
The Working Families Party executive director said his group paid $100,000 and disbanded its for-profit campaign arm in order to "put this nuisance lawsuit behind us." [Celeste Katz]
The shut-down of the for-profit arm will probably weaken WFP politically, "at least in the short term." [Liz Benjamin]