Election 2012 postseason play: Fox News vs. MSNBC
The Lineup collects the media stories, big and small, that are on our radar each day.
In a move that could only be described as "fair and balanced," The New York Times business section today includes profiles of enemy cable news outlets MSNBC and Fox News.
On the left (the left-hand margins of pages B1 and B2, that is) we have Fox News featured in David Carr's latest Media Equation column, which declares:
On Tuesday night, the people in charge of Fox News were confronted with a stark choice after it became clear that Mr. Romney had fallen short: was Fox, first and foremost, a place for advocacy or a place for news?
In this moment, at least, Fox chose news.
And here's Brian Stelter on the ground MSNBC has gained on its bellicose rival:
MSNBC, a unit of NBCUniversal, has a long way to go to overtake the Fox News Channel, a unit of News Corporation: on most nights this year, Fox had two million more viewers than MSNBC.
But the two channels, which skew toward an audience that is 55 or older, are on average separated by fewer than 300,000 viewers in the 25- to 54-year-old demographic that advertisers desire. On three nights in a row after the election last week, MSNBC—whose hosts reveled in Mr. Obama’s victory — had more viewers than Fox in that demographic.
“We’re closer to Fox than we’ve ever been,” said Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC
Sidenote: Stelter's piece includes the following tidbit:
Several MSNBC employees, who spoke about programming plans on the condition of anonymity, said the most likely candidate for a new show was the Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein, a frequent substitute for Ms. Maddow. Mr. Klein may start with a weekend time slot, but these people said the 8 p.m. weekday time slot held by [Ed] Schultz was also a possibility.
MSNBC pushed back on the rumor, telling Politico: "We're very happy with the performance of our primetime lineup, which topped Fox News Channel three nights this week. There are no changes planned."
And if you still want more Fox News fodder, here's Howard Kurtz writing on The Daily Beast about the rising starpower of anchor Megyn Kelly.
In other news...
Times public editor Margaret Sullivan: "The Times has pulled no punches in reporting on Mr. Thompson’s role and on the wider BBC story." [NYT/Public Editor's Journal]
Times union members are "deeply divided" on their proposed new contract. [Jim Romenesko]
The Washington Post hasn't sought comment from its editor who co-authored the Gen. Petraeus biography reported by his paramour. [The Huffington Post]
A reporter raises the question of conflict of interest at Playbook. [The Huffington Post]
The Financial Times is reportedly in talks about a deal with Thomson Reuters. [The Telegraph]
Bloomberg Businessweek is under fire for its ranking of B-schools with the hottest females. [The Daily Dot]