American Girl: The Wallis Simpson story, told differently

View this article on one page

Page 3 of 4

Wallis was not the first woman with whom he became obsessed. In 1918 he met Freda Dudley Ward, who was married to a Liberal MP, William Dudley Ward “vice chamberlain of the Royal Household and therefore often out late on public duties,” Sebba writes, “the ideal mari complaisant.” Edward was obsessed with her, sometimes writing her three letters in a day. He wrote to Ward in baby-talk, as Sebba quotes: “I’m just dippy to die with YOU even if we can’t live together...” His behavior bears a strong resemblance to the approach he would take to Wallis, and making him seem as much “That Man” as she was “That Woman,” at the highest levels of power and prestige and yet always, ineluctably other.

Wallis was openly interested in meeting the prince from the moment she moved to London, and in 1931 she did, through her friend Thelma Furness, who was herself having an affair with the prince, after he and Freda were no longer an item, though she, too, was married. To keep up some appearance of innocence, Furness needed a married couple for cover, to “chaperone” a gang for a weekend at Thelma’s home in Leicestershire—fox-hunting country—with the prince.

Sebba uncharacteristically lacks many details for this weekend, but the two met again at a later cocktail party Furness also hosted, and then again when Wallis and Ernest were “presented to the Court.” It’s not totally clear how Wallis went from there to entertaining the Prince at a dinner party at her home in 1932, but she did, and she and Ernest were then invited to spend a weekend at the Fort. They went on to spend many weekends there, which Ernest enjoyed at least in the beginning, although as time went by it was clear that Thelma was inviting the pair for Wallis’s benefit, as the prince had fallen for her “sharp tongue and risque repartee.”

Sebba spends some time considering why the prince was so attracted to that sharp tongue and risque repartee, suggesting that there was a deeper psycho-sexual dynamic between the two. Observers noted that Wallis frequently humiliated, or emasculated the prince, by such things as taking over the carving of a chicken by seizing the knife from his hand, or having him call her a taxi instead of one of his abundant staff. When they were alone—without guests at the fort—Wallis was noted by staff members to “taunt and berate him until he was reduced to tears.” He then overcompensated to please her.

The root of either of their sexual tendencies and interpersonal tics is, of course, pure speculation, but Sebba does, emphatically, speculate. Apparently the Prince had a lack of body hair, and the staff “questioned his virility.” Wallis may have had a sexual condition that made her feel incomplete, imperfect, and insecure. In a bit of a reach, with a very small grain of sand, Sebba writes, “But, drawing the conclusion that Wallis, with her obviously dominating personality, was therefore able to satisfy both his repressed and his yearning for a mother figure is, again, speculation, however likely it may seem.”

Regarding Wallis, Sebba writes, “Psychologists may have an explanation for her behavior: the ideal partner for her personality would be one who allowed her to appear the perfect one, the other (him) as the inadequate one and the one who carried the flaw.”

If all of this comes close to the truth, the myth of the love story between Edward and Wallis is reduced to little more than two complicated, wounded psychologies feeding off each other. “In this way an aspect of one is transferred to the other which makes both partners feel good and as a result each person develops a vital sense of closeness with the other,” Sebba writes.

The first time it seemed as if the Prince might have truly singled Wallis out as a real object of affection was on the eve of a trip she was taking to the United States. She received a radiogram from him fondly wishing her good-bye and a safe journey. “Nonetheless at this stage,” Sebba writes, “Wallis believed it was evidence of no more than than a mild interest, though perhaps something to make Thelma jealous, and that she had the situation well under control.”

“Well under control” is phrase that comes up throughout the next part of the book. Sebba’s interpretation is less that Wallis seduced or charmed Edward—although she took quickly and passionately to his lifestyle—but that he was obsessed with her and was not a man who liked, or was very good, at being managed, and Wallis lost control of everything fairly quickly, ending up carried along by his obsession.

When Thelma left for an extended stateside trip, and the Prince was suddenly without a mistress—he put the full weight of his admiration on Wallis. He came by her house to see her nearly every day, came for dinner several times a week, phoned two or three times a day, and she was expected at the Fort on weekends and whenever else she could make time. Ernest hadn’t raised any formal objections; “at the moment he’s flattered with it all, “ Wallis wrote her aunt. But she admitted, with a touch of anxiety, that “keeping up with 2 men is making me move all the time.” Wallis is generally blamed for Edward's “summary dismissal,” according to Sebba, of Thelma upon her return from America, and also of Freda, who at the time the Prince still had as a mother figure, but Sebba suggests that it was more his awkwardness and lack of courage that made the breaks so bad.

In the summer of 1934, Wallis went, without Ernest, on a vacation with the prince. They were not entirely alone, of course; princes tend to travel with an entourage; Wallis’s Aunt Bessie went with them to Biarritz, and the Rogerses went with them when the whole group went cruising on a friend’s boat, but Wallis later wrote of the trip, “Perhaps it was during those evenings off the Spanish coast that we crossed the line that marks the indefinable boundary between friendship and love.”

The royal opinion can be summed up the report from Hon. John Aird, who was along for the vacation as a staff member, and who was offended by Wallis’s brash behavior, and by the prince’s apparent adoration for it. By the end of it, Aird wrote, the prince had “lost all confidence in himself and follows W around like a dog.” After the trip, the prince insisted on presenting Wallis before the King and Queen, reportedly began paying Wallis an income, and at the same time began gifting her an ever-expanding collection of jewelry, a topic of much gossip in London.

It becomes a matter of interpretation at this point as to who was pulling what strings. The old guard disapproved and abhored the idea of Wallis as Queen; the newer guard found the idea exciting because it meant there was a way, a way for nearly anyone, into the royal family; the royal family itself wanted her gone, and of course commissioned an investigation, but then in the investigation it came out that Ernest himself (who had already been admitted to the prince’s Mason order) was fine with the whole arrangement because he expected the prince to become king soon, at which point he imagined he would have his wife back and be awarded “high honours.” It can be difficult, around this point in the story, to keep the chronology of events clear. Like the seemingly endless and slippery lists of names that Sebba inserts, it requires of the reader a certain leap of faith that the author will ultimately produce, at the end of a chapter, a sense of overall familiarity that makes the story complete, which she does.

Comments (7)
BlueRidgeMountainsGal wrote on February 17, 2012, 4:22 PM [Link]

Anne Sebba's book is rubbish; it is based on third hand speculation and none of Wallis or Edward's relatives have ever been interviewed for the compilation of Sebba's book and as a result it is riddled with inaccuracies, innuendo and downright fiction.

Wallis was a lifelong Democrat and a cousin of President Harry S Truman via her mother's side of the family, the Merrymans; her father was a Native American who was adopted by the Warfield family after his mother died in childbirth.

Wallis' mannish looks were 100% Native American and as anybody who ever really knew her well will tell you she had the most extraordinary deep violet eyes. Letters between her and that other violet-eyed diva Elizabeth Taylor often refer to the 'Violet Club' that the women sometimes joked about belonging to - as does Edward's private correspondence to her.

It's simply not true that she had no birth certificate, it's just one of the private documents that Sebba has not been able to gain sight of along with all the other intellectual property left by the Duke and Duchess to their heir and sole legatee - like passports, marriage licences, health documents, legal papers etc.

As for her health she suffered a lifetime of Crohn's Disease which meant she could only eat sparingly and from a limited menu; the sexual references to some sort of rogue chromosome are also rubbish and Wallis's many miscarriages are a matter of record.

Had Sebba bothered to do some proper research she would have been able to find out who formed the trust that bought and still maintains to this day the Blue Ridge Mountains, Pennsylvania house where Wallis was born along with much personal information that is glaringly missing from her speculative and tacky fictionalised account.

Sebba is also completely off the rails is about the Duke and Duchess' political affiliations; they were sent by the British Prime Minister in 1937 as official UK government envoys to talk to Adolf Hitler as part of an official British government strategy of appeasement.

The Duke was a fluent German speaker and agreed to the trip after much lobbying by the British PM; of course the trip was a disaster and their disgust of the Fuhrer is well documented in personal diaries which are the property of their sole legal heir.

This is not the French lawyer Maitre Blum, as Sebba claims, the Duke and Duchess' respective wills were filed with their life long London lawyers and never published for security reasons.

Then there are at least two documented two assassination attempts on the Duke and Duchess' lives by Hitler's hired hitmen in Spain and in France, something that has been conveniently glossed over as part of the Nazism jibe at the couple.

As for the antagonism of the British royal family to the marriage, that was pure anti-Americanism at its worst; the Duke's mother Queen Mary was convinced a solution to the Hitler problem 'lay with the crowned heads of various European royal houses' - who in the end were futile to act despite the huge groundswell of optimism over stark reality.

Edward wanted a full British-American treaty against the Nazis but was thwarted by the British Establishment whose prejudice against the 'Yanks' was rooted in misguided feeling of superiority over the former 'colonists'.

The British political classes viewed such a pact with the US as unthinkable and this was further compounded by various House of Windsor members who were appalled that a 'red Indian gal' had the gall to fancy herself as the consort of the King and Emperor; this too is well documented in private papers that Sebba has not been privileged to see.

That racism eventually came to a painful head when Wallis and her husband sued US Senator Strom Thurmond - the racist/segregationist who stood against President Truman in the 1948 Presidential election and famously lost! - for racist defamation, libel and harassment.

The couple won a substantial seven figure damages payout which took several years to collect from the old skinflint.

After the Duke's death Wallis lived mainly in London, New York and in Washington with the person who inherited both Edward's and her estate; she spent a certain amount of time in her Paris home but 99% of her remaining 14 years of widowhood saw her in London and New York. Indeed, the royal bank Coutts & Co had to specially open a branch in North London's exclusive Hampstead neighborhood when the Duchess moved there in 1983, to cater for all her spending!

She most certainly did not die alone and the identity of the person who gave doctors permission to switch off her life support is the same as the couple's sole legal heir. (again not Maitre Blum, the French shyster lawyer convicted of stealing from Wallis).

It is also worth mentioning that Madonna recently referred to being unable to get the copyright to a book about Wallis for her movie W.E.; the copyright holder of that biography has inherited all of Wallis and Edward's (so far) unpublished intellectual property and will be publishing the only authorised biography of Wallis' life later this year.

A brief comparison to that book's contents to Anne Sebba's book is like likening a beautiful, genuine diamond necklace to a tacky bit of costume paste, ditto all the other so-called Wallis books that have trumped the same rehashed tired nonsense.

I trust the above clarifies the situation and puts into perspective points missing in your book review.

Ginger wrote on September 21, 2012, 11:11 AM [Link]

Thank you so much Blue Ridge Mountains Gal, for the informative and insightful above comments.
Sandra L.

Capucine wrote on October 12, 2012, 12:55 PM [Link]

Thank you Blue Ridge Mountains Gal, I refuse to read authors that feel it is literary privilege to "fill in the blanks".

Capucine wrote on October 12, 2012, 12:56 PM [Link]

Thank you Blue Ridge Mountains Gal, I refuse to read authors that feel it is literary privilege to "fill in the blanks".

Clau1215 wrote on October 12, 2012, 6:19 PM [Link]

All I can say that Edward was and considered himself more German than Englis and would of loved if Hitler won the War. Wallis would have been his Queen. He should have been tried for treason for all of the secrets he gave to Hitler. This would include where they should entered France which caused Dunkirk. Read up on your world history. Take a course. Travel a bit out of the USA!!!!

Lillie wrote on November 6, 2012, 3:54 PM [Link]

Well written review.

Lillie wrote on November 6, 2012, 3:58 PM [Link]

Reviewer did a fine job.

Post your comment